[고2] 2025년 3월 모의고사 32번 - 지문 구성, 그림 설명, 원문 비교

[고2] 2025년 03월 – 32번: 성공의 연속성과 Matthew 효과에 대한 의문

 

Great scientists are seldom one-hit wonders. Newton is a prime example: beyond the Newtonian mechanics, he developed the theory of gravitation, calculus, laws of motion, and optimization. In fact, well-known scientists are often involved in multiple discoveries, a phenomenon potentially explained by the Matthew effect. Indeed, an initial success may offer a scientist legitimacy, improve peer perception, provide knowledge of how to score and win, enhance social status, and attract resources and quality collaborators, each of these payoffs further increasing her odds of scoring another win. Yet, there is an appealing alternative explanation: Great scientists have multiple hits and consistently succeed in their scientific endeavors simply because they're exceptionally talented. Therefore, future success again goes to those who have had success earlier, not because of advantages offered by the previous success, but because the earlier success was indicative of a hidden talent. The Matthew effect posits that success alone increases the future probability of success, raising the question: Does status dictate outcomes, or does it simply reflect an underlying talent or quality? In other words, is there really a Matthew effect after all?

 

 

 

구분	내용	원문
주장	위대한 과학자들은 드물게 한 번의 성공에 그치지 않는다.	Great scientists are seldom one-hit wonders.
예시	뉴턴은 역학 외에도 중력 이론, 미적분학, 운동 법칙 등을 개발했다.	Newton is a prime example: beyond the Newtonian mechanics, he developed the theory of gravitation, calculus, laws of motion, and optimization.
근거	초기 성공은 과학자에게 정당성을 부여하고, 동료들의 인식을 향상시키며, 자원과 우수한 협력자를 끌어들여 추가적인 성공의 가능성을 높인다.	Indeed, an initial success may offer a scientist legitimacy, improve peer perception, provide knowledge of how to score and win, enhance social status, and attract resources and quality collaborators, each of these payoffs further increasing her odds of scoring another win.
반론	대안적 설명으로, 위대한 과학자들은 단순히 예외적으로 재능이 뛰어나기 때문에 여러 번의 성공을 거둔다고 볼 수 있다.	Yet, there is an appealing alternative explanation: Great scientists have multiple hits and consistently succeed in their scientific endeavors simply because they're exceptionally talented.
문제 제기	성공이 미래 성공의 확률을 증가시키는가, 아니면 초기 성공이 숨겨진 재능을 나타내는가?	The Matthew effect posits that success alone increases the future probability of success, raising the question: Does status dictate outcomes, or does it simply reflect an underlying talent or quality?

 

 

 

 

* 원문 지문은 내용 동일해 생략함

 

 

 

관련 자료 바로가기

[고2] 2025년 3월 모의고사 - 한줄해석

[고2] 2025년 3월 모의고사 - 한줄해석 (좌지문 우해석)

[고1~고3] 2025년 3월 모의고사 - 지문 정리 (문제 제작용 hwp 한글 파일)