[고3] 2025년 3월 모의고사 40번 - 지문 구성, 그림 설명, 원문 비교

[고3] 2025년 03월 – 40번: 알고리즘이 인간 의도와 다르게 결과를 낼 수 있음

 

It may be assumed that meta-algorithmics, that is, the creation of algorithms that generate other algorithms, is a human creation as well. A human programmer must have composed the first algorithm that, in turn, generates new algorithms and as such the initial programmer must be in control of the original idea. However, this is not necessarily true. Unlike humanly conceived ideas, where the author is the intellectual owner of the idea, algorithms are processes that define, describe, and implement a series of actions that in turn produce other actions. During the transfer of actions it is possible for a discrepancy to occur between the original intention and the actual result. If that happens then, by definition, the author of the algorithm is not in control of, and therefore does not own intellectually from that point on, the resulting process. Theoretically, ownership of an idea is intrinsically connected to the predictability of its outcome, that is, to its intellectual control. Therefore, in the absence of human control the ownership of the algorithmic process must be instead credited to the device that produced it, that is, to the computer.

 

 

구분	내용 설명	원문
통념	메타 알고리즘은 인간이 만든 것이며, 최초의 알고리즘 생성자는 인간 프로그래머라고 생각한다.	It may be assumed that meta-algorithmics, that is, the creation of algorithms that generate other algorithms, is a human creation as well. A human programmer must have composed the first algorithm that, in turn, generates new algorithms and as such the initial programmer must be in control of the original idea.
반박	그러나 알고리즘은 다른 행동을 생성하는 일련의 과정을 정의하며, 이 과정에서 원래 의도와 실제 결과 사이에 불일치가 발생할 수 있다.	However, this is not necessarily true. Unlike humanly conceived ideas, where the author is the intellectual owner of the idea, algorithms are processes that define, describe, and implement a series of actions that in turn produce other actions. During the transfer of actions it is possible for a discrepancy to occur between the original intention and the actual result.
주장	결과적으로, 알고리즘의 예측 가능성이 없다면, 그 소유권은 그것을 생성한 컴퓨터에 귀속되어야 한다.	If that happens then, by definition, the author of the algorithm is not in control of, and therefore does not own intellectually from that point on, the resulting process. Theoretically, ownership of an idea is intrinsically connected to the predictability of its outcome, that is, to its intellectual control. Therefore, in the absence of human control the ownership of the algorithmic process must be instead credited to the device that produced it, that is, to the computer.

 

 

 

 

 

	문제 지문	원문 지문
1	It may be assumed that meta-algorithmics, that is, the creation of algorithms that generate other algorithms, is a human creation as well.	It may be assumed that meta-algorithmics, that is, the creation of algorithms that generate other algorithms, is a human creation as well.
2	A human programmer must have composed the first algorithm that, in turn, generates new algorithms and as such the initial programmer must be in control of the original idea.	A human programmer must have composed the first algorithm that, in turn, generates new algorithms and as such the initial programmer must be in control of the original idea.
3	However, this is not necessarily true.	However, this is not necessarily true.
4	Unlike humanly conceived ideas, where the author is the intellectual owner of the idea, algorithms are processes that define, describe, and implement a series of actions that in turn produce other actions.	Unlike humanly conceived ideas, where the author is the intellectual owner of the idea, algorithms are processes that define, describe, and implement a series of actions that in turn produce other actions.
5	During the transfer of actions it is possible for a discrepancy to occur between the original intention and the actual result.	During the transfer of actions it is possible for a discrepancy to occur between the original intention and the actual result.
6	If that happens then, by definition, the author of the algorithm is not in control of, and therefore does not own intellectually from that point on, the resulting process.	If that happens then, by definition, the author of the algorithm is not in control of, and therefore does not own intellectually from that point on, the resulting process.
7	Theoretically, ownership of an idea is intrinsically connected to the predictability of its outcome, that is, to its intellectual control.	Theoretically, ownership of an idea is intrinsically connected to the predictability of its outcome, that is, to its intellectual control.
8	Therefore, in the absence of human control the ownership of the algorithmic process must be instead credited to the device that produced it, that is, to the computer.	Therefore, in the absence of human control the ownership of the algorithmic process must be instead credited to the device that produced it, that is, to the computer.
9	-	Such a possibility, however, will be objected by those who believe that intellectual ownership can only be credited to an agent that possesses enough intelligence to be aware of its ownership, i.e. possesses consciousness. Unlike humans, computers are not aware of their environment. Perhaps then it may be necessary to define some other kind of awareness that may be only theoretical. This theoretical entity then would be the owner and the reason behind these intellectual phenomena until they possess a physical or legal substance.

 

* 원문 참고 어휘

• possess 소유하다
• consciousness 의식
• awareness 인식
• theoretical 이론적인
• entity 실체

 

 

관련 자료 바로가기

[고3] 2025년 3월 모의고사 - 한줄해석

[고3] 2025년 3월 모의고사 - 한줄해석 (좌지문 우해석)

[고3] 2025년 3월 모의고사 - 지문 요약 by ChatGPT-4o

[고1~고3] 2025년 3월 모의고사 - 지문 정리 (문제 제작용 hwp 한글 파일)