[3] 2025 03  37: 기술업계의 자율 규제가 비전문적임을 지적

 

Self-regulation has been suggested as an alternative way to hold the tech industry to account. But when tech lobbyists speak of self-regulation, they are not describing it as it is understood by professionals like doctors. Unlike in medicine, there are no mandatory ethical qualifications for working as a software engineer or technology executive. There is no enforceable industry code of conduct. There is no obligatory certification. There is no duty to put the public ahead of profit. There are few consequences for serious moral failings; no real fear of being suspended or struck off. Recent years have seen an explosion of AI ethics charters and the like, filled with well-meaning generalities about the responsible use of powerful computers. But without consequences for violating them, these charters are just toothless statements of aspiration. The tech industry is basically saying: trust us. But blind trust is not how we govern doctors, lawyers, bankers, pilots or anyone else in unelected positions of social responsibility. Tech is the exception, and it's not clear why.

 

 

구분 내용 설명 원문
주장 기술 산업의 자기 규제는 의사와 같은 전문직의 자기 규제와 다르며, 효과적이지 않음을 지적함. Self-regulation has been suggested as an alternative way to hold the tech industry to account. But when tech lobbyists speak of self-regulation, they are not describing it as it is understood by professionals like doctors.
근거 소프트웨어 엔지니어나 기술 임원에게는 의무적인 윤리 자격, 강제력 있는 행동 강령, 필수 인증, 공익 우선 의무 등이 없음을 설명함. Unlike in medicine, there are no mandatory ethical qualifications for working as a software engineer or technology executive. There is no enforceable industry code of conduct. There is no obligatory certification. There is no duty to put the public ahead of profit. There are few consequences for serious moral failings; no real fear of being suspended or struck off.
예시 최근 AI 윤리 강령이 많이 생겼지만, 이를 어겨도 처벌이 없어 실효성이 없음을 예로 듦. Recent years have seen an explosion of AI ethics charters and the like, filled with well-meaning generalities about the responsible use of powerful computers. But without consequences for violating them, these charters are just toothless statements of aspiration.
반박 기술 산업이 '우리를 믿어라'고 하지만, 다른 전문직에서는 맹목적인 신뢰로 운영되지 않음을 지적함. The tech industry is basically saying: trust us. But blind trust is not how we govern doctors, lawyers, bankers, pilots or anyone else in unelected positions of social responsibility.
결론 기술 산업이 예외적인 대우를 받고 있으며, 그 이유가 명확하지 않음을 강조함. Tech is the exception, and it's not clear why.

 

 

 

 

 

  문제 지문 원문 지문
1 Self-regulation has been suggested as an alternative way to hold the tech industry to account. Self-regulation has been suggested as an alternative way to hold the tech industry to account.
2 But when tech lobbyists speak of self-regulation, they are not describing it as it is understood by professionals like doctors. But when tech lobbyists speak of self-regulation, they are not describing it as it is understood by professionals like doctors.
3 Unlike in medicine, there are no mandatory ethical qualifications for working as a software engineer or technology executive. Unlike in medicine, there are no mandatory ethical qualifications for working as a software engineer or technology executive.
4 There is no enforceable industry code of conduct. There is no enforceable industry code of conduct.
5 There is no obligatory certification. There is no obligatory certification.
6 There is no duty to put the public ahead of profit. There is no duty to put the public ahead of profit.
7 There are few consequences for serious moral failings; no real fear of being suspended or struck off. There are few consequences for serious moral failings; no real fear of being suspended or struck off.
8 Recent years have seen an explosion of AI ethics charters and the like, filled with well-meaning generalities about the responsible use of powerful computers. Recent years have seen an explosion of AI ethics charters and the like, filled with well-meaning generalities about the responsible use of powerful computers.
9 But without consequences for violating them, these charters are just toothless statements of aspiration. But without consequences for breaching them, these charters are just toothless statements of aspiration.
10 The tech industry is basically saying: trust us. The tech industry is basically saying: trust us.
11 But blind trust is not how we govern doctors, lawyers, bankers, pilots or anyone else in unelected positions of social responsibility. But blind trust is not how we govern doctors, lawyers, bankers, pilots or anyone else in unelected positions of social responsibility.
12 Tech is the exception, and it's not clear why. Tech is the exception, and it’s not clear why.

 

* 원문 참고 어휘

  • breach 위반하다 (= violate)

 

 

관련 자료 바로가기

 

[고3] 2025년 3월 모의고사 - 한줄해석

안녕하세요, Flow 영어연구소입니다. 2025년도 3월 고3 영어 모의고사>의 한줄해석 자료 올립니다.설명문/실용문을 포함 모든 지문을 대상으로 작업했습니다. 자료는 PDF와 Word 파일 모두 올

flowedu.tistory.com

 

[고3] 2025년 3월 모의고사 - 한줄해석 (좌지문 우해석)

안녕하세요, Flow 영어연구소입니다. 오늘은 2025년도 3월 고3 영어 모의고사>의 한줄해석(좌지문 우해석) 자료 올립니다.설명문/실용문 포함 전지문 작업했습니다. 자료는 PDF와 Word 파일 모

flowedu.tistory.com

 

[고3] 2025년 3월 모의고사 - 지문 요약 by ChatGPT-4o

안녕하세요, Flow 영어연구소입니다.오늘은 2025년도 3월 고3 영어 모의고사>의 지문 요약 자료 올립니다.ChatGPT 유료 버전(ChatGPT-4o)으로 작업했고,설명문/실용문을 제외한 전지문을 포함

flowedu.tistory.com

 

[고1~고3] 2025년 3월 모의고사 - 지문 정리 (문제 제작용 hwp 한글 파일)

안녕하세요, Flow 영어연구소입니다. 오늘은 2025년도 3월 고1~3 영어 모의고사>의 지문 텍스트만한글 파일 hwp와 pdf 파일로 정리해서 올립니다.변형문제 출제를 위해 해당 지문들을 hwp 한글 파일

flowedu.tistory.com

 

+ Recent posts