[11강 - Exercise 1번]
본문 지문
Defining the boundaries of a field is, perhaps, a foolish objective. A narrow definition risks excluding issues that should be included. Too broad a definition, on the other hand, risks absorbing research problems that are just too irrelevant. In either case, of course, scholars can choose to ignore your definition. There are several ways one can proceed. One tactic is to focus on which scholars define themselves in the field. The problem with this approach is that the field of the sociology of markets is sufficiently diffuse that there may be multiple communities of scholars with differing concerns contained within it. Even if one could draw a circle around the field, one would still not understand what its focus or questions were. The opposite strategy is to impose a theoretical definition of the field. This approach has the advantage of focusing on a theoretical perspective, presumably of interest to a wide number of scholars. But one is likely to leave out scholars and issues that are of relevance to the field. You may quickly reduce your audience to those who agree with you.
Google Books 검색 문구
may be multiple communities of scholars with differing concerns contained within
Google Books