[고1] 2025년 9월 모의고사 24번 - 지문 구성, 그림 설명, 원문 비교

[고1] 2025 09월 – 24번: 동물 실험과 의학 발전의 상관관계에 대한 반론

 

Many opponents of animal experimentation argue that not only is modern medicine not the only cause for the decline in mortality, many medical advances that did contribute to human health were not the result of animal experimentation. Defenders of research have claimed that since there is a strong correlation between the practice of animal experimentation and medical advancement, the former caused the latter. Opponents of research reject this inference. After all, we have independent reasons to expect these phenomena to be correlated. Since the law prescribes that all new drugs, prosthetic devices, and surgical techniques be tried on animals before they are used in humans, we will subsequently find that all medical advances are correlated with prior experimentation on animals. Consequently, the correlation between animal experimentation and medical discovery is the result of legal necessity, not evidence that animal experimentation led to medical advances. Moreover, several influential physicians have offered historical evidence that animal experimentation has not been as responsible for biomedical discovery as defenders suggest. They claim that clinical discoveries played a more substantial role than animal researchers have led us to believe.

 

 

 

[지문 구조 분석]

구분	내용	원문
실험 반대측 주장	동물 실험 반대자들은 현대 의학의 발전이 동물 실험 덕분만은 아니며, 많은 의학적 성과가 동물 실험 없이 이루어졌다고 본다	Many opponents of animal experimentation argue that not only is modern medicine not the only cause for the decline in mortality, many medical advances that did contribute to human health were not the result of animal experimentation.
실험 옹호측 주장	동물 실험 옹호자들은 동물 실험과 의학 발전 사이의 강한 상관관계가 인과관계를 의미한다고 본다	Defenders of research have claimed that since there is a strong correlation between the practice of animal experimentation and medical advancement, the former caused the latter.
실험 반대측 반박	동물 실험 반대자들은 상관관계는 법적 필수 요건 때문에 발생한 것이며, 인과관계를 증명하지 못한다고 본다	Opponents of research reject this inference. After all, we have independent reasons to expect these phenomena to be correlated. Since the law prescribes that all new drugs, prosthetic devices, and surgical techniques be tried on animals before they are used in humans, we will subsequently find that all medical advances are correlated with prior experimentation on animals.
실험 반대측 결론	동물 실험 반대자들은 동물 실험과 의학적 발견의 상관관계가 법적 필요성 때문이지, 인과관계의 증거가 아니라고 본다	Consequently, the correlation between animal experimentation and medical discovery is the result of legal necessity, not evidence that animal experimentation led to medical advances.
실험 반대측 결론의 추가 근거	몇몇 영향력 있는 의사들은 동물 실험보다 임상적 발견이 더 큰 역할을 했다고 본다	Moreover, several influential physicians have offered historical evidence that animal experimentation has not been as responsible for biomedical discovery as defenders suggest. They claim that clinical discoveries played a more substantial role than animal researchers have led us to believe.

 

 

[이미지]

 

 

[원문 비교]

	문제 지문	원문 지문
1	Many opponents of animal experimentation argue that not only is modern medicine not the only causefor the decline in mortality, many medical advances that did contribute to human health were not the result of animal experimentation.	Many opponents of experimentation argue that not only is modern medicine not the sole cause for the decline in mortality, many medical advances that did contribute to human health were not the result of animal experimentation.
2	Defenders of research have claimed that since there is a strong correlation between the practice of animal experimentation and medical advancement, the former caused the latter.	Defenders of research have claimed that since there is a strong correlation between the practice of animal experimentation and medical advancement, the former caused the later.
3	Opponents of research reject this inference. After all, we have independent reasons to expect these phenomena to be correlated.	Opponents of research reject this inference. After all, we have independent reasons to expect these phenomena to be correlated.
4	Since the law prescribes that all new drugs, prosthetic devices, and surgical techniques be tried on animals before they are used in humans, we will subsequently find that all medical advances are correlated with prior experimentation on animals.	Since the law (at least in the US) prescribes that all new drugs, prosthetic devices, and surgical techniques be tried on animals before they are used in humans, we will subsequently find that all (recent) medical advances are correlated with prior experimentation on animals.
5	Consequently, the correlation between animal experimentation and medical discovery is the result of legal necessity, not evidence that animal experimentation led to medical advances.	Consequently, the correlation between animal experimentation and medical discovery is the result of legal necessity, not evidence that animal experimentation led to medical advances.
6	Moreover, several influential physicians have offered historical evidence that animal experimentation has not been as responsible for biomedical discovery as defenders suggest.	Moreover, several prominent physicians have offered historical evidence that animal experimentation has not been as responsible for biomedical discovery as advocates suggest.
7	They claim that clinical discoveries played a more substantial role than animal researchers have led us to believe.	They claim that clinical discoveries played a more substantial role than animal researchers have led us to believe.

* 원문 지문의 2번째 문단의 later는 typo로 생각됨. 

 

* 원문 참고 어휘

• sole 유일한 (= only)
• prominent 저명한 (= influential)
• advocate 옹호자 (= defender)

 

 

 

 

관련 자료 바로가기

[고1] 2025년 9월 모의고사 - 한줄해석

[고1] 2025년 9월 모의고사 - 한줄해석 (좌지문 우해석)

[고1~고3] 2025년 9월 모의고사 - 지문 정리 (문제 제작용 hwp 한글 파일)